Creation? or Evolution?

Creation? or Evolution?
2007.06.17 22:13

Missing link is a hypothesis there might have existed the pre humans that connect apes to modern humans. The reason of this claim is as follows. Although we can find many species closer to each other in the case of other animals, we can't find a closer species to modern humans. So assumption here is we must have had pre humans that were much closer to modern humans but we haven't found them -that is called ' missing link'. And the archaeological evidence that proves the existence of pre humans are not found yet. Missing link is used somehow to explain human's unique existence from other species. Missing link is supportive to creationist' s insistence.
Even if some result proves man's existence merely dated back to 6000 years ago, that doesn't tell anything whether humans existed before 6000 years ago.
Evolution was led from many scientific experiments and partly from archaeological evidence, but not entirely from artifacts. Lack of evidence in artifacts has nothing to do with the support of any theories.
So whatever the reason you believe a man was created by God around 6000 years ago.
But I believe 4.57 billion years ago the Earth was born and 3.7 billion years ago life on Earth started. 200,000 years ago current humans were born. 6000 years ago human civilisation started.
As to the reply to your question, yes, I think so. Our species were originated from a common human ancestor that appeared in some part of Africa 200,000 years ago. The number of our ancestors was considerably fewer than now.
And most important thing here.
Creation? or Evolution? That's an obsolte dichotomy. It is unknown whether life was born by itself or created by God. But life evolves. If you are a creationist, you can say ' humans are a form of life that were brought by God on the Earth some 3.7 billion years ago.' If you are an evolutionist, you can say ' humans are a form of life that were born on the Earth some 3.7 billion years ago. ' Life evolves, but nobody knows the origin of life was spontaneouly appeared or brought by some intelligent Being with intention.

Life Evolves

Hello, ***

I spend today Sunday with my girlfriend.

I plan to come to Tuesday's meeting if it's not rainy.

I come on Thursday, so I'm sure I see you then.

Here's the reply to your recent mail.

Missing link is a hypothesis there might have existed the pre humans that connect apes to modern humans. The reason of this cliam is as follows. Although we can find many species closer to each other in the case of other animals, we can't find a closer species to modern humans. So asumption here is we must have had pre humans that were much closer to modern humans but we haven't found them -that is called ' missing link'. And the archaeological evidence that proves the existence of pre humans are not found yet. Missing link is used somehow to explain human's unique existence from other species. Missing link is supportive to creationist' s insistence.

Even if some result proves man's existence merely dated back to 6000 years ago, that doesn't tell anything whether humans existed before 6000 years ago.
Evolution was led from many scientific experiments and partly from archaeological evidence, but not entirely from artifacts. Lack of evidence in artifacts has nothing to do with the support of any theories.
So whatever the reason you believe a man was created by God around 6000 years ago.

But I believe 4.57 billion years ago the Earth was born and 3.7 billion years ago life on Earth started. 200,000 years ago current humans were born. 6000 years ago human civilisation started.

As to the reply to your question, yes, I think so. Our species were originated from a common human ancestor that appeared in some part of Africa 200,000 years ago.
The number of our ancestors was considerably fewer than now.

And most important thing here.

It was unknown whether life was born by itself or created by God. But life evolves. If you are a creationist, you can say ' humans are a form of life that were brought by God on the Earth some 3.7 billion years ago.' If you are an evolutionist, you can say ' humans are a form of life that were born on the Earth some 3.7 billion years ago. ' Life evolves, but nobody knows the origin of life was spontaneouly appeared or brought by some intelligent Being with intention.

Mer

Religion & Science

Hello, XXX...

Two attachments were succesfully saved in my document and I finished reading them now. Then it's your turn....What is your question?

The way they argue is very similar to your reply.

When some one raised some question like ' I learned that human species appeared on the Earth 200,000 years ago.' You put a question on its accuracy, then next you showed examples that support your idea. I have to agree with you at least in this point. Don't you think this is not an argument?

I think both religion and science claim that both of them are true, and I fairly believe in the end the aim of both is the same -that is to seek for the truth.

Bible started being written 5000 years ago, still no science was found as now. We need to understand the Bible description in line with modern scientific result. Both religion and science are beneficial to humans.

Mer

After Adam

I completely agree with the chronology after Adam, I was trying to talk about before Adam. In comparison with the relatively long history that is about 200, 000 years ago of current human species, Adam was merely born 6000 years ago.

You didn't give your idea as to my chronology, but just you said common knowledge people usually took it for granted has sometimes mistakes and some scholar say human only appears on the Earth some 6 or 7 thousand years ago.

This is the basic difference between us.

539 BC is completely fine and 40XX BC is also generally acceptable, and I realised it is counterproductive for us to talk about the chronology before Adam. I admit Adam was the first human who started our civilisation, so from my point of view he is the first civilian, in other words human.

Anyway a bit explain to me as to Moses 30 day month, etc..


Mer

Human Chronology

Hi, XXX...

I attended the book study meeting as usual held in your condo on Tuesday. YYY and I talked about my Slashdot article - he read it at his office! that was about the concept of time. Regarding this we talked about Bible chronology.

Basically I believe current humans -homo sapience appeared 200,000 years ago. Probably Adam was born at least 7000 years ago. YYY didn't give his idea as to my chronology, but just he said common knowledge people usually took it for granted has sometimes mistakes and some scholar say human only appears on the Earth some 6 or 7 thousand years ago.

How do you think about human chronology? You endorse the result of current anthropological 'common knowledge' or you have your understanding based on Bible description?

Mer

PS, Dear Mr. Mer, is too formal, I prefer being called Mer instead. ;)

Send me some picture, please!

Terrific

Hi, ,

I'm Ok, you said you expect long letters, but I had nothing to say in long letters. That's the reason I hadn't sent.

I haven't had a perpetual relationship with anyone yet, I always feel frustrated these days everyday.

Do you plan to visit my house? If now, I am not working at night.... Last time you visited Australia, you could have come, I feel so reget that you didn't.

I enjoyed the photos you sent me.

Terrific!


..